Date: 2014-10-20 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
# but about those who defended and applauded her. She
# admits she dehumanized her victims, and so it becomes
# clear that her supporters defended this type of abuse
# from all angles. Not just harsh language, but
# dehumanization. I wonder if they still will defend
# what she did as being necessary, or "sometimes over
# the line," or whether they will apologize for their role in it.

This is the elephant in the room. She was nommed for a Hugo, not for her fiction writing, but specifically for her hateful invective blog. Her "Requires Hate" persona was championed as 'insightful critique' by very large numbers of people. Looking into it all now, I realize that much of what she's done is almost certainly illegal under UK law, and would get you six months in jail (being upped to 2 years shortly). Surely this makes many of her supporters accessories to the fact?

The SF community is sailing very close to the edge on this one. If something serious had happened (like the obvious case of an actual suicide) and outside forces came into the community to investigate, what do we think would have happened?
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

azarias: (Default)
azarias

June 2023

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18 192021222324
252627282930 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 12:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios